Is my title demand preposterous? If it is, how is it more preposterous than to think that the literal eating of a singular fruit from a singular tree, albeit forbidden by The Lord, can be carefully that evil that Adam and Eve should lose their opening of a corporal life in paradise and access to the Tree of Life? If a child in our care were to disobey our study for the first time would we lash out with a severe punishment at the first offence of disobedience? Obviously not, so why did The Lord punish our primary parents so severely for eating the wrong kind of 'apple'? Ok, I know it doesn't say apple but it might just as well say it, so does this apparent trivial error and the punishment that follows it make any sense, or, in other words, does the punishment fit the crime? Well, if we take it a step supplementary and accept the Biblical record as symbolic for something else, then, yes it does make sense. Indeed, we can then assume, without much doubt, that Adam and Eve's sin was so serious, so heinous, that the Lord had no option but to banish our primary parents from the Garden. This then leaves us with the demand of what kind of offence(s) or sin(s) could it have been that would warrant such a severe punishment?
Up until recently I was of the mind, like so many others, that Adam and Eve's sin was just a uncomplicated act of disobedience, but writings I have discovered just lately have thrown a giant spanner into the works of my primary understanding of their primary sin. My understanding, too, not helped much by what is written in the King James Bible. However, always remember, that as believers, our understanding is never ours it's the understanding we are given and The Lord does not give us all understanding, all at once, or at the starting of our walk with Him. It takes years of study and much waiting on Him. Having clarified that dinky aside, let's write the crucial verses here so that we can see for ourselves what the Holy Scriptures surely say:
Men Sleepwear
Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
This verse is the most prominent and influences the whole of this study, for it mentions two seeds. Now what are these "seeds", because before we can move on we must be clear in our minds as to what they laid out and, after a dinky research, we find it's all very right forward. Most readers will know what the word 'seed' means in this context but to make sure, let's use an additional one example or two so that there is no ambiguity or confusion:
Genesis 9:8-9 And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying, 9 And I, behold, I manufacture my contract with you, and with your seed after you.
Gen 15:3 And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir.
So as we can simply see, the word 'seed' refers to offspring and if we refer to Strong's Concordance for supplementary evidence we will find that the Hebrew word for 'seed' in Genesis 3:15 is the same as in Genesis 9:9 and 15:3. Ok, so if we go back to Genesis 3:15 we can see that the Lord is going to put enmity between these two very distinct seeds or lines, but who is the Lord speaking to? Let's go there now:
Genesis 3:14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
There we have it; the Lord is speaking to the Devil, Satan, that serpent and arch-deceiver also known as the destroyer, the adversary and in this instance the arch-seducer, for, without doubt, one of the two seeds mentioned here is his seed. Observation too the phrase "because thou hast done this". From that we can surely deduce and know that Satan surely did something and the term 'doing something', more often than not, refers to a corporal action, not just an 'action' of sitting idly by on the sidelines enticing, goading or provoking as an exuberant spectator.
So what does all this mean for we are very definitely dealing with a corporal seed that belongs to the Devil? In turn, this now beggars the question, how can a spirit being or a fallen angel have corporal sexual relations with a human being? Well, the only verse in the Holy Scriptures we can rely on or turn to for any evidence to this event is in Genesis once more:
Genesis 6:1-2 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
Who were these "sons of God" here that took the descendants or daughters of Adam for wives? Well they can only be one thing, they were fallen angels or angels that went astray and left their first estate as described in Jude 6
Jude 1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
The prominent words of this verse are 'kept not', 'first estate' and 'habitation'. The words 'kept not' mean they failed to keep a guard or failed to hold as precious their Spiritual legacy or estate, i.e. To declare any value upon their Spiritual substance and the honour bestowed upon them as Spirit beings. Instead they took it upon themselves to select the lower order of the corporal or the base level of corporal men. This means they despised their first estate and located more value upon human fleshly desires and, don't forget, these daughters were human beings in the fallen condition. These angels treated with contempt their manifestly higher order that the Lord had blessed them with, their 'first estate' - their position. Not only that, they gave up their home as well or their classic habitation; very reckless and foolish indeed. So much so, it finally cost them their relaxation because the Lord incarcerated them in darkness, where they are to this day and where they will remain until the Last Great Day at the end of the Millennium or the end of the Lord's one thousand year reign on this earth as King of kings.
Now this brings us to the primary issue, this wickedness was not a one off, this had all happened before, and it was a consequent on from the earlier wickedness of their leader, Satan the Devil, otherwise known as Sammael in the other writings I mentioned. He set the example and these fallen angels followed in his footsteps, and their actions were a repeat of his wickedness. So what was this wickedness? Quite simply, it was the seduction of Eve. We can then add in the cuckolding of Adam or possibly even the sodomising of Adam - we do not know all the details. What we do know, though, is that the Devil contaminated their Godly union which up until that point had not been consummated. Adam and Eve discovered the sexual act straight through perversion and straight through lust and nothing but lust. This event was a compounding event, because after the Devil had had his evil way with Eve he then, straight through Eve, encouraged Adam to take her afterwards thereby reducing her to the status of a sexual object, an adulteress or possibly worse, a promiscuous slut. This, in effect, was the first pornographic act - the first threesome; the use of the woman's body for nothing but selfish sexual gratification. There was no love in this event, and it was the first sexual act on earth between a man and a woman. This, too, is how they knew they were naked and covered themselves with leaves and why, too, they hid from the Lord in the garden. They covered their sexual parts, they were laden with shame and guilt - they felt dirty and contaminated. Furthermore, it was this act that gave them the knowledge of good and evil, not straight through the literal eating of an 'apple', the fruit is pure symbolism. Not only that, if we think the literal eating of fruit from the wrong tree can make us feel dirty, unclean and shameful what kind of fruit could that be. Ok, we could and would feel guilty for having disobeyed God but not dirty and ashamed. No, there is only one act that could have had that kind of consequent on a previously innocent human being and that act is the promiscuous, lustful, loveless sexual act.
Ok, so we now have the evidence that this wicked event took place, but where does this lead us? Quite simply, back to the two seeds, the two seeds that produced two offspring - Cain and Abel. One child was of the Devil's seed and the other was of Adam's seed. How do we know this? Not easy, because the King James Bible is not that helpful, so we have to look elsewhere, but where? Well, before I do that let's copy the Kjv verse here, first, to analyse what it says:
Gen 4:1-2 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord. 2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
Now, based upon the evidence that I have revealed from the Holy Scriptures, Genesis 4:1 seems to read like a unblemished contradiction of the old verses. We know there are to be two seeds, but this verse looks as if it's saying that Cain is Adam's son and Abel is Adam's son and not only that, but that Cain was a gift to Eve from God himself no less. Now where have the two seeds gone, because if Cain and Abel are both Adam's sons then they can only be of the one seed for they are both of Adam's seed, so what's going on in this verse? Well we know don't we, the true evidence has been written out of the record by the translators. Now there's a surprise, and why would they do that!? They would do it, because it would mean having to admit what I have stated above, that Eve had sex with Devil and produced Cain from that illegitimate union. The thing is, we have got a whole load of stuff going on in Genesis 4:1 and it will require an additional one record to cover it, so stay with it folks.
Did Eve Have Sex With the Devil Or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit? - Part 1
